Notes More Reliable Than Memory After Accident

The victim that submits a personal injury claim can expect a larger compensation, if that same claim reflects the full cost of the victim’s injuries. That statement refers to the mental and emotional costs, as well as those that reflect the accident’s physical consequences. At the same time, such a statement underscores the wisdom behind taking notes on every aspect of the accident claim process.

Notes of greatest significance

Those would be the notes that provide detailed information on the victim’s injuries. What effect did those injuries play on deciding the future lifestyle of the injured victim? Did those effects include problems such as pain, anxiety, discomfort or trouble sleeping? If the victim had to struggle with that sort of problem, that struggle needs to be recorded in some manner and evidence provided to personal injury lawyer in Trenton.

Supplementary information that could be of great value

A recollection of how the accident happened: At what time of day did it take place? What was the weather like at that time? Where was the plaintiff headed?
In what ways did the victim receive a shock? In what manner was a blow struck to the victim’s body? Any uncertainty about the answers to those questions might be erased by the answer to one further question.
What sounds did you hear? A parent or other adult might hear a cry from a child. That could hint at the existence of an unseen medical problem.
How many people were in the car? What has been lost by each of the victims? To what extent did any of them lose an opportunity? Did any sacrifice time in a classroom or at meeting? Did any of them get forced to forego a vacation?

Conversations that ought to be recorded

That would be any conversation that the victim has, regarding his or her claim. It could be with a witness, an insurance adjuster, a lawyer or a physician.

How to give greater meaning to what has been recorded

In order to accomplish that goal, victims should consider the possibility of returning to the site of the accident. During that return trip, the victim’s possession of a camera could prove quite helpful. The camera could be used to take pictures, in an effort to back-up some of the victim’s claims.
Pictures of the scene would allow for a readier visualization of where the plaintiff’s car was, with respect to the defendants. Was that automobile sandwiched between two vehicles? If that were the case, then any one injury’s severity would seem far more probable. In other words, pictures and recorded facts could emphasize the veracity of the victim’s claims. Hence, the insurer would have little reason to doubt the veracity of the victim’s statements.